<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent World MMA Rankings: July, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/</link>
	<description>MMA Opinion and Cheap MMA Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reppin og style</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8487</link>
		<dc:creator>reppin og style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-8487</guid>
		<description>i guess that&#039;s how u do, of course when you&#039;re...



wait for it...


wait for it...


WAIT FOR IT...


REPPIN OG STYLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wow just like blowin a load ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess that&#8217;s how u do, of course when you&#8217;re&#8230;</p>
<p>wait for it&#8230;</p>
<p>wait for it&#8230;</p>
<p>WAIT FOR IT&#8230;</p>
<p>REPPIN OG STYLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>wow just like blowin a load <img src='http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaf</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8131</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-8131</guid>
		<description>Nice list, very nice. I like you heavy list. A lot of new blood this year and the oldies get kicked out. Gonzaga (love the guy) is out after 1 loss and so is Verdum :)

We gonna see Randy beat Nog and prove he&#039;s a top 5 at UFC 102.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list, very nice. I like you heavy list. A lot of new blood this year and the oldies get kicked out. Gonzaga (love the guy) is out after 1 loss and so is Verdum <img src='http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We gonna see Randy beat Nog and prove he&#8217;s a top 5 at UFC 102.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironman</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7473</link>
		<dc:creator>ironman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-7473</guid>
		<description>Nick Diaz is eligible to be ranked in the welterweight and middleweight divisions. His fight with Denny makes him eligible at 170. His bout with Shamrock and Smith, under the catchweight rule, make him eligible at middleweight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Diaz is eligible to be ranked in the welterweight and middleweight divisions. His fight with Denny makes him eligible at 170. His bout with Shamrock and Smith, under the catchweight rule, make him eligible at middleweight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7472</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-7472</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Mils. Glad to see Brett Rogers make the top 10 too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Mils. Glad to see Brett Rogers make the top 10 too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mils</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7471</link>
		<dc:creator>Mils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-7471</guid>
		<description>Nice work, they look pretty good. I&#039;d knock Jardine down two notches at 205 tho. What weight class is Nick Diaz&#039;s true home? He belongs on one of those lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, they look pretty good. I&#8217;d knock Jardine down two notches at 205 tho. What weight class is Nick Diaz&#8217;s true home? He belongs on one of those lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironman</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7464</link>
		<dc:creator>ironman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-7464</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t one, and chances are good that there won&#039;t be one. The pound-for-pound criteria is so inconsistent that it doesn&#039;t really have an impact on real rankings. Pound-for-pound discussions become an issue, fairly quickly, of &quot;which #1 divisional fighter do you like the most.&quot; There are a handful of members of the panel that really think the idea is pretty weak, so we&#039;ll stick to ranking in weightclasses, though we&#039;ll certainly be adding weight classes (women&#039;s divisions and, potentially, a men&#039;s flyweight division) over the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t one, and chances are good that there won&#8217;t be one. The pound-for-pound criteria is so inconsistent that it doesn&#8217;t really have an impact on real rankings. Pound-for-pound discussions become an issue, fairly quickly, of &#8220;which #1 divisional fighter do you like the most.&#8221; There are a handful of members of the panel that really think the idea is pretty weak, so we&#8217;ll stick to ranking in weightclasses, though we&#8217;ll certainly be adding weight classes (women&#8217;s divisions and, potentially, a men&#8217;s flyweight division) over the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/07/17/independent-world-mma-rankings-july-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7463</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3445#comment-7463</guid>
		<description>Nice to see Brock high up, but where&#039;s the P4P list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see Brock high up, but where&#8217;s the P4P list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

