<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strikeforce: Overeem vs. Rogers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/06/29/strikeforce-overeem-vs-rogers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/06/29/strikeforce-overeem-vs-rogers/</link>
	<description>MMA Opinion and Cheap MMA Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VEe</title>
		<link>http://www.mmaopinion.com/blog/2009/06/29/strikeforce-overeem-vs-rogers/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>VEe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmaopinion.com/?p=3203#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to this match-up!

I would particularly like to see how both fighters do in the later rounds with their massive bulk. Overeem should just take the fight to the floor and work Rogers over. Forget trying to prove your prowess on your feet, just finish the fight. But imagine how crazy the fight would be if Rogers is more than proficient in takedown defense and submission defense?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to this match-up!</p>
<p>I would particularly like to see how both fighters do in the later rounds with their massive bulk. Overeem should just take the fight to the floor and work Rogers over. Forget trying to prove your prowess on your feet, just finish the fight. But imagine how crazy the fight would be if Rogers is more than proficient in takedown defense and submission defense?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

