Abusers and the Abused: Steroids and MMA
By Josh Stein on Feb 10, 2009
When I hear a discussion about the use of steroids in MMA, there are a few stories that immediately jump to mind and make me consider the future of mixed martial arts. The revelations about professional baseball players abusing steroids as a way to enhance performance has opened up a very interesting debate (and a poll at fightticker that is worth checking out).
Karo Parisyan’s recent bust for what seems to be a pain killer cocktail (though I don’t know a great deal about the medicinal effect) is certainly going to offer an important talking point, but it seems to me that there are more important examples, and a few jump to mind fairly quickly.
Josh Barnett, Mark Kerr, Thiago Alves and Tim Sylvia make for interesting anecdotes and offer some insight into the nature of steroid and drug abuse as well. What is more important, though, at least in my opinion, is the impact that a widespread acceptance (or at least understanding) of the power steroids have on athletics would have on MMA.
The first thing that we should acknowledge, for the sake of intellectual honesty, is that there’s a reason baseball players, and other athletes, abuse steroids. They work.
Some people will say that you need relaxation and technical skills for MMA. You need to have flexibility and cardio and those are things that you can’t get from a needle. While there’s some truth to that, it’s important to acknowledge that by drastically increasing muscle recovery and helping to add muscle mass and strength, as well as having an impact on weight cuts (as was suspect in the incident with Thiago Alves), mixed martial artists have a huge amount to gain by abusing drugs that are prohibited by the legal authorities that regulate the sport.
That’s not a defense of steroid abuse, that’s a fact that needs to be stated if we are to understand the debate.
Steroids are terrible for the fighters long term health (and sometimes even their short term health) and this is a travesty, but in a sport where there isn’t much money and there is a huge amount of pressure to succeed at the highest levels, to fight in the UFC, to make a name as a contender and then to win a title, hearing that you can have longer, better workouts and not be as sore afterwards is a huge weight to lift.
The problem is that fighters shouldn’t be penalized for caring about their long term health, and the roll of the athletic commission should be to protect the health of the fighter, even when they don’t want themselves protected. Josh Barnett and Tim Sylvia are off of the banned substances now, and it’s almost certainly better for their bodies, even if their performance in the ring isn’t what it might be if they were shooting up once a week.
I would speak about the obligation of the fans to protecting the health of the fighters, but it does me no good to pound an imaginary pulpit. This is not a debate that we, as fans, play a major roll in. Just as fans may be outraged in professional baseball, it’s not as though they can shriek that the quality of their product has suffered as a result of substance abuse.
What we, as fans, need to be aware of is that this is expressly an issue between the bodies that govern the sport and the athletes that compete. A fighter may endanger his opponent by using steroids, because he has given himself an edge and tweaked his hormon levels in a way he doesn’t entirely understand, but the fight fan is not worried about that, just as the fan is not worried about an injury the fighter might have sustained before the fight.
The concern of the fan is the fight itself, which is why we have a commission, which is why there is a regulating body. Normally I invoke the fans to demand something, but this is one time when it isn’t our place to cry out or complain. We can have our opinions, we can have a dialogue, but when push comes to shove, this is an aspect of the sport that is beyond our reach, and perhaps it is good that it is, because we wouldn’t want to be responsible for the many failures that will undoubtedly come.
Filed Under: MMA
About the Author: Joshua Stein is a writer and editor for MMA Opinion. He has worked as a photographer and journalist and has a number of print journalism credits. He also works as a moderator for MMAForum.com and a grappling columnist (covering judo, collegiate wrestling, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and submission grappling) for profighting-fans.com.














Here’s my obligatory rant comment for the day. (Oh by the way … I love drugs, read the Unauthorized Biography of Cocaine by Dominic Streatfeild)
“mixed martial artists have a huge amount to gain by abusing drugs”
Hey, if something effects my ability to earn money a-la Sean Sherk it is really not a good look. There are no $150 million dollar contracts in MMA. They have a lot to lose if they get caught. So I really do not see why a fighter would use steroids. And it really sucks to get caught in a losing effort. James Irvin. BUT, fuck the commission is I still have a little weed in my system. Nick Diaz beat Gomi. Gomi knows it.
Fans don’t give 2-cents if a fighter sustained an injury during the fight or before the fight. They do not know or care for the most part.
Randy Couture def. Tim Sylvia*
Forrest Griffin def. Mauricio Rua*
Sylvia and Rua had serious surgeries after their fights. Sure Rua ran out of gas, but don’t tell me Griffin was dominating the fight. And let’s face it, Randy is not Fedor. Far from it.
Fans want a Freaking KO at all cost! They don’t care that Marcus Davis, Thiago Silva, Anderson Silva, Patrick Cote, etc. fought with injured or surgically repaired limbs, they want and care about stoppages. No decisions here, I want a stopppage. You broke your shin in half, I don’t care . . . knock out your opponent. That’s competitve contact sports in general.
Do you want pain killers? Try the NBA, NHL, NFL and MLB.
“The public wants a true heavyweight champion.”
-Brock Lesnar.
Vee, interesting comment.
I’m happy to acknowledge what fans want. I think that’s obvious.
Of course, if you don’t see why fighters use steroids (though I think you do, you just don’t agree with it), then you kinda missed the point of the article.
Fighters need to fight, and they can’t fight with injuries, so they used steroids as a way to repair those injuries. Or they use steroids as a way to make weight, or a way to perform better (so that they can win that fight and put themselves in a position to make more money).
There’s a huge risk. Steroids wrecked Josh Barnett’s career in the U.S. for years, as well as his relationship with the UFC (and it cost him a title belt). Of course, plenty of people ignore the cautionary tale. They think “it’s not going to be me.” Is that a bad frame of mind? Yeah. Is it illogical? Alot of the time (especially in the UFC or Affliction, where the top guys all get tested). But they rationalize it anyway.
I understand using the drugs for quicker muscle recovery. Stephan Bonnar, James Irvin needed to recover quickly to compete. But the risks can be even more damaging to the pockets.
Yeah, I just don’t agree.
Josh, I agree that this issue is between the commissions, promoters, and the athletes. However, I don’t think there is really an honest debate on this issue within the athletic commissions. Of all the banned substances, steroids are demonized the most, which I think has more to do with the media and the public, however they can benefit athletes with minimal side effects if taken properly under medical supervision (Please see the following for more on this debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0LEj8IPHGU . Prohibition doesn’t work, and I think the commissions need to face this and have to figure out what can be done to ensure that athletes don’t abuse this stuff, and this may be controlled better if they get their doctors involved to monitor this. Outright prohibition will ensure continued abuse with no control or supervision. I am not saying athletes should use steroids or other banned substances. Commissions and promoters have the right to determine which substances they will and will not allow athletes to take. I just think that this may be a losing battle, and they need to continue to debate all options.
Dane, that’s a fair point. If steroid use was standardized, then it’d certainly be easier to track and regulate and keep the fighters healthy.
Unfortunately, they are banned because of long term effects and side effects. I’m not going to pretend to be a medical expert, but those I have talked to have made a point of the hormone imbalance issue.
It’s really got to be handled on a drug-to-drug issue, and I’d like to know that there’s a debate going on, but, like you said, that may not happen.