Sorry to hear that. After reading over the quick results from the fights, I realized just how weak the card was from the standpoint of an cash-strapped enthusiast. Aside from the Penn vs. Stevenson fight, nothing else on the card had the potential to lead into something bigger and I certainly wasn’t about to drop my $50 to really watch two bouts and 8 rounds. Only boxing promoters and fans throw away their money like that. I saw everything I needed to see on the animated GIF’s at Fight Report.
So, for those of you who paid to see a delayed UFC 80; why? Why did you let Dana White set up a card that made UFC 78 look good while taking your money? Did you just want to see B.J. Penn up against someone with some ground skills? Do you like big Brazilians with upset oppurtunity? Are you Jess Liaudin’s uncle?
Once the numbers come back, Zuffa and White can tell everyone that Joe Silva is a genius for putting together this card. Truth be told, most of the British fans didn’t care who was fighting - just that the UFC was back in the country and this was their chance to take part in some violence. Not there is anything wrong with controlled violence - I am a MMA fan myself, you know.
Be on the lookout for the numbers and let’s hope there is some disappointment in the eyes of White or else we can look for more random fight cards in the future. And if the UFC decides to come to New Jersey again, they better put something better than that shipwreck. Maybe I’m just a little upset that it was one of the few cards that I could have realistically attended without breaking the bank. Or maybe I want to see some more hype and more excitement with the matches that the UFC throws together. So far I have been more excited to watch my HDNet Fight Nights on the DVR on a weeknight by myself. That’s probably not what White would want to hear, but he has the ability to change that. But will he?


















January 21st, 2008 at 12:12 am
I don’t know why this card is catching so much heat. It was a very fun card to watch and the best event so far in the UK. The undercard wasn’t weak, it was underrated and Joe Silva and the UFC did a great job putting great style matchups together. I would gladly shell out $40 per PPV if every event was as exciting as UFC 80.
January 21st, 2008 at 12:38 am
I was expecting someone to say that, Adam, and I think it’s catching a lot of heat because you can watch smaller promotions for a lot less and still see the same kind of action. People pay the UFC $40-$50 (it’s an extra 10 for us HD geeks) to see the star power and big name matches. I kinda agree that you can see excitement without big names, but I don’t see why I would have to pay for that, ya know?
Thanks for the comment!
January 21st, 2008 at 12:49 am
I’m with you Brandt. I def. wouldn’t have shelled out the money, and I almost didn’t go down to the local Buffalo Wild Wings to watch it for free. I was more excited about this week’s UFN.
I did score a free poster though…